November 6, 2009
The 1959 World Series, Game Six -- improbable champions
Sometimes you hear it said that baseball's post-season reveals weaknesses in teams that went undetected during the regular season. I've never really subscribed to this view. The 162 game season (and its 154 game predecessor) should expose any true weaknesses. The much shorter post-season (only four to seven games in the old days) has more to do with chance than with revealing hidden truths about a squad.
On the other hand, I believe the post-season can reveal things about managers who, due to the pressure and the format of an elimination series, can find themselves managing quite differently than they did during the regular season. Sometimes, to put it bluntly, they panic. And, at the risk of contradicting my opening paragraph, when managers panic in the post-season, their decisions tend to reflect their innermost fears - justified or not - about weaknesses in their squad that were not apparent during the regular season.
We have seen how Milwaukee Braves manager Fred Haney tried to get through the 1958 World Series by having Warren Spahn and Lew Burdette pitch 51 of his team's 63 innings. It didn't work, nor should Haney have believed it would.
In 1959, Al Lopez went into the World Series with six pitchers in whom he had real confidence - Early Wynn, Bob Shaw, Dick Donovan, Billy Pierce, Jerry Staley, and Turk Lown. That's a little thin, but probably not fatally so. By way of comparison, his opposite number, Walter Alston, had perhaps four pitchers he trusted greatly - Don Drysdale, Roger Craig, Johnny Podres, and Larry Sherry -- and perhaps three more he trusted up to a point -- Sandy Koufax, Stan Williams, and Clem Labine. This year, the Yankees and Phillies both seemed to have about eight pitchers they mostly trusted.
When relievers Staley and Lown struggled early in the Series, Lopez seemed to lose faith in them, even though during the regular season they had formed one of the best relief tandems in the history of baseball to that point. Facing elimination in Game 5, Lopez had used Donovan and Pierce to relieve Shaw, instead of Staley and Lown. This meant that in Game Six, Lopez felt constrained to hand the ball to Wynn, age 39, even though he had only two days rest.
The result was disastrous. In the third inning Wynn gave up a two-run homer to Snider (this was the 11th and final home run for this Dodgers legend, who had not started the previous three games). In the fourth, Demeter singled, Roseboro sacrificed him to second, Wills singled him in, and Podres, the pitcher, doubled in Wills.
Lopez then brought in Donovan (not Staley or Lown), even though he had started Game Three and relieved in Game Five. Donovan walked Gilliam and allowed a double to Neal. After Moon then homered, the Dodgers were up 8-0.
The White Sox rallied in the bottom of the inning. Kluszewski smashed a three-run homeer off of Podres and the White Sox then loaded the bases with two out. However, Larry Sherry, who had helped load them, retired Aparicio to end the inning. Sherry gave up only three hits over the final five innings, and the Dodgers cruised home to victory, 9-3.
For the Dodgers it was an improbable championship. They had finished seventh in 1958, and in 1959 had only the fifth best run differential in the majors. I haven't checked, but I'd be surprised if, in the days of 16 teams and no post-season other than the World Series, any team ever won a championship with the fifth best run differential. The Dodgers could also count themselves lucky that the Yankees imploded in 1959. The 1958 and 1960 Yankees would have been favored against the '59 Dodgers. But then, so were the White Sox, if I remember correctly.
The 1959 championship came at the exact mid-point between the Dodgers' previous one in 1955 and their next one in 1963. The '59 team was a mixture of holdovers from '55, such as "Boys of Summer" Hodges, Furillo, and Snider; mainstays of the 1963 team like Drysdale, Koufax, Roseboro, and Wills; and solid but unspectacular players for whom this would be their only championship with the Dodgers, e.g., Demeter, Neal, and Larker. Larry Sherry, who won two games and saved the other two Dodgers wins in this Series would play only a bit part on the 1963 team. The only Dodgers who contributed meaningfully to all three championships were Podres, Gilliam, and of course Alston, the skipper.
For the White Sox, 1959 was a great success despite the World Series failure. They had won the pennant for the first time since 1919, the year of the Black Sox, and in doing so had broken the Yankees streak of four straight pennants.
The future didn't look great, however. Of Lopez's core pitchers, only Shaw was under age 30, and Wynn and Staley were 39 and 38, respectively. Among the eight non-pitchers who started most often in the Series, only Landis and Aparicio were under 30.
The White Sox would double down on aging veterans in 1960. Hoping to make one more run at a championship, they added Minnie Minoso (37) and Roy Sievers (33). The result was another very good team, probably better than the 1959 version, but not quite good enough to stave off the resurgent Yankees. New York finished 10 games ahead of Chicago, albeit with an almost identical run differential.
The White Sox would not make it back to the post-season until 1983 and their next World Series (which they won) was not until 2005 - a wait that exceeded by six years the seemingly interminable one that had ended in 1959.
Uighurs In Paradise, Part II
The Uighurs are Muslims from East Turkmenistan who no doubt have legitimate grievances against the Chinese who have conquered and colonized their country, if such it ever was. But some of them decided to pursue jihad against China and went to Afghanistan to train with al Qaeda. They were there at the end of 2001 when we routed the Taliban and captured a number of terrorists and terrorist trainees. The Uighurs fell in the latter category.
The Uighurs posed no great threat to the U.S., notwithstanding their extreme Muslim beliefs, and the Bush administration would have been happy to let them go. But the only country that wanted them was China, and the Chinese government would have killed them the moment they got off the airplane. So, for humanitarian reasons, the Bush administration held the Uighurs at Guantanamo Bay and tried to find someone who would take them.
The Obama administration finally succeeded in that effort, but at considerable cost. The first batch of Uighur terrorist trainees were resettled in Bermuda. We wrote about it here. Going from East Turkmenistan to a training camp in Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay to Bermuda may not be quite like dying and going to Heaven, but it's awfully close.
Now the second batch of six Uighurs has been resettled, in Palau. Palau has little in common with Bermuda except that both are island paradises. The Associated Press reports:
Palau, a clutch of islands east of the Philippines that is home to some 20,000 people and still relies on funds from Washington, offered to take all but one of the Uighurs. Both sides denied the offer was linked to U.S. aid. ...
[President Johnson] Toribiong is taking a personal interest in the resettlement. He turned out to welcome them when they arrived before dawn Sunday. On Wednesday, he plans to treat them to a boat trip and picnic in Palau's Rock Islands, the country's main tourist destination and one of the world's top diving spots. ...
Earlier, the Uighurs spent time at an Internet cafe, setting up e-mail accounts and contacting relatives in Australia and four fellow former detainees now living in Bermuda.
Nearby, their government-supplied home has spotless hardwood floors, a fresh coat of paint, new furniture and appliances, and a sweeping view of the ocean. Washington is paying for the Uighurs' housing, job training, food and other costs in Palau.
To the men's visible relief, a large air conditioner was delivered Tuesday afternoon to help them cope with the tropical heat. High speed internet--a rarity in Palau--and cable television are scheduled to be installed on Wednesday.
Here is a photo of the resettled Uighurs, having shaved their long beards to fit in with the local population:
Here, a couple of the would-be terrorists go wading in the Pacific Ocean:
Here, they are grilling beef skewers on the beach:
Here, they board a boat for the picnic in the Rock Islands referred to above:
It's hard to know what to make of this, apart from the fact that the world is a weird place, and getting weirder all the time. I'm fine with resettling the Uighurs, but is it really necessary for U.S. taxpayers to fund "spotless hardwood floors, a fresh coat of paint, new furniture and appliances, and a sweeping view of the ocean"? Not to mention housing, job training, food, and all other living expenses, including air conditioning, cable television and high-speed internet, which is a "rarity" in Palau. If the administration is looking for volunteers to live at government expense in an island paradise, count me in.
No doubt these expenses are a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions that the Obama administration is wasting here at home. But could it be any clearer that we are living under a government that treats our tax money--which is to say, our work; our time; our lives--with contempt?
Tune In Tomorrow
Tomorrow I'll be on the radio from 11 to 1 central, as usual, with my radio partner Brian Ward on AM 1280 the Patriot. You can listen on the internet here. At 11:30 central, 12:30 eastern, we'll be interviewing Michael Barone. Tune in to hear Michael's thoughts on Tuesday's results and the new edition of his Almanac of American Politics.
Living in a World Gone Mad
Mark Steyn, at The Corner:
The Headline of the Day, from the BBC:
Shooting Raises Fears For Muslims In US Army
Really? Right now the body count stands at:
Non-Muslims 13
Muslims 0...Even if you take the view that it would be grossly unfair if all Muslims were to be tarred by Major Hasan's brush, it is, to put it at its mildest, the grossest bad taste to default every single time within minutes to the position that what's of most interest about an actual actrocity with real victims is that it may provoke an entirely hypothetical atrocity with entirely hypothetical victims.
The BBC article is actually worse than the headline. There is, though, a certain black humor to this kind of news coverage. For example:
Kamran Memon of the organisation Muslims For a Safe America says the subject splits America's Muslim community down the middle.
"Those at one end of the spectrum say we should have nothing to do with the US armed forces as they are involved in wars with our fellow Muslims abroad," he told the BBC.
"Those at the other end say we should definitely serve and help defend our country against those who wish to attack it."There is no easy answer to this."
It's a puzzle, all right.
Mr Memon says the vast majority of Muslim citizens in America are "able to live peaceful lives", even though they have probably suffered some discrimination, if only a hostile look, since the 11 September 2001 attacks.
Raise your hand if no one has given you a hostile look since 2001. I actually get a lot of them, but then, I'm a lawyer.
However, there have been some high profile incidents in recent years that have fuelled tensions.
At a camp in Kuwait, as his unit prepared to move into Iraq in March 2003, Sergeant Hasan Akbar threw hand grenades and opened fire on a tent full of sleeping soldiers in the early hours of the morning.
Yes, that could tend to fuel tensions. Maybe even lead to a hostile look. Meanwhile, we're still waiting for that hypothetical atrocity, as Mark put it, with its hypothetical victims.
Jumping to Conclusions
President Obama took another pass at commenting on the Fort Hood massacre in the Rose Garden this morning:
This morning I met with FBI Director Mueller and the relevant agencies to discuss their ongoing investigation into what caused one individual to turn his gun on fellow servicemen and women. We don't know all of the answers yet, and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all of the facts.
"Don't jump to conclusions" is an all-purpose tautology, like "Don't panic." It's hard to argue with. One wonders, though, exactly what conclusions he has in mind. I think it's safe to predict that President Obama will never reach those conclusions, let alone jump to them.
The most informative and straightforward account of the massacre I've seen is in London's Sun newspaper. It pays tribute to policewoman Kimberly Munley, who was on a routine traffic patrol and became the first officer on the site. (There were lots of soldiers there, of course, but they were all unarmed because it was a "gun-free zone"--sort of a microcosm of the adage that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.) It would have been easy for her to conclude that this incident was way beyond her pay grade and wait for reinforcements, but instead Sgt. Munley sought out the murderer, confronted him and shot him four times while being wounded herself. The Sun quotes Base Commander Lt. Gen. Bob Cone:
Often you circle the building and wait for back-up. But the thinking is if you act aggressively and take-out the shooter you have less fatalities.
Presumably that doesn't constitute jumping to conclusions.
PAUL adds: Suddenly, President Obama doesn't want to jump to conclusions. He had no such compunction about jumping to conclusions when his friend Professor Gates harangued a police officer.
I think we can jump to a few in this case. The shooter hated the United States and its armed forces. The shooter's grievances were political and religious in nature. In addition, the shooter may have had grievances specific to things that were said and done to him. Any such grievances cannot remotely explain or justify his resort to violence, much less mass killing. The killings are best viewed as an act of terrorism grounded in radical Islam.
A FEW MORE CONCLUSIONS (jumped to by Paul): The shooter should be executed. If the shooter is not executed, this country is in more trouble than I thought. There should be an investigation into how the shooter remained in the Army, given his increasingly obvious anti-American radicalism.
The rule against soldiers carrying weapons on military bases should be revisited. The rule against soldiers having their weapons "locked and loaded" on bases in combat areas (yes, a friend who served in Iraq tells me there was such a rule on his base) should be revoked.
Today's Unemployment Figure In Context
Unemployment has reached a 26-year high of 10.2 percent. Today the House Republican Conference sent out this graphic, which is essentially the same as the chart that we've been following for some months now; click to enlarge:
It's gone past the point where we could officially declare the "stimulus" bill a failure. At this juncture, I don't see how to avoid the conclusion that the administration's economic policies, taken as a whole, have been misguided.
UPDATE: Heh.
Pro Musica Hebraica
Pro Musica Hebraica is an organization devoted to presenting Jewish classical music -- much of it lost, forgotten, or rarely performed -- in a concert hall setting. It is the project of Charles and Robyn Krauthammer (respectively, the chairman and the chief executive officer). Charles Krauthammer discussed the project in some depth during this interview with the Jerusalem Post.
Pro Musica Hebraica's concerts take place at the Kennedy Center here in Washington. Each concert focuses on the music of a particular era and a particular venue.
Last night, my wife and I had the pleasure of attending what I believe was the third concert. Its focus was on baroque music from Holland and Italy in the 1600 and 1700s. The music was performed, wonderfully, by the Apollo Ensemble of Amsterdam, which was making its United States debut.
Two of the selections were by Salamone de Rossi, described as the premier Jewish composer of the Italian Renaissance. The "show-stopper," however, was a piece called "Dio, Clemenza e Rigore" (God, the defender, and the prosecutor). It is an anonymous composition from 1733, created in the Jewish community of a small town in the Piedmont region of Italy for the seventh day of Sukkot. Its origins, however, go back to 16th century Safad, an amazing town in northern Israel and the center of Jewish mysticism.
In this composition, God summons Clemenza and Rigore to argue for and against mankind before He issues His final verdict. Rigore makes a compelling case against us all (the lyrics were translated on an overhead screen for the audience), while Clemenza pleads for forgivenes.. Ultimately, God rules in favor of compassion.
"DIo, Clemenza e Rigore" is operatic, presumably in the fashion of the Italian operas of the time. But it also reflects both the Jewish liturgical tradition and the influence of the new mysticism.
The musical score was lost for two centuries until finally being discovered in 1964 at the Lenin State Library in Moscow, of all places. In 1992, it was edited in Israel and made available for artistic revival.
Pro Musica Hebraica's next concert will be on April 29, 2010. It will consist of an evening of French Jewish music from the 19th and 20th centuries. We don't intend to miss this one, and I'm hoping that Power Line's regular music critic, Scott Johnson, will be able to make it to town for the occasion.
The Truth Leaks Out
It's remarkable, really, how often voters somehow figure out the truth, despite the fog of obfuscation that frequently passes for news. A case in point: Rasmussen finds that 72 percent of voters believe that "passage of the proposed health care plan could lead companies to drop private health insurance coverage for their employees. Forty-eight percent (48%) say it's very likely." Moreover, 53% say it would be a bad thing to be forced out of a private insurance plan and into a government-run plan.
They're right. I'm not sure quite how the truth leaks out, but I hope we have a tiny bit to do with it, along with a great many others.
Still "50-50 nation"?
The unemployment rate has jumped to 10.2 percent according to figures released today, three days after the 2009 election. This is the highest rate in 26 years. It is also almost exactly one-third higher than the unemployment rate on election day 2008.
I don't blame Obama, except for over-promising. However, I suspect a great many voters blame him, and blame the governors of their state and their representatives in Congress, especially Democratic ones.
It is for this reason that I agree only with half of Charles Krauthammer's analysis of Tuesday's election. Krauthammer writes:
November '08 was one shot, one time, never to be replicated. Nor was November '09 a realignment. It was a return to the norm -- and definitive confirmation that 2008 was one of the great flukes in American political history.
There should be no dispute that the 2008 election did not reflect the political norm. But neither did this year's -- not with the economy in such bad shape.
A normal election, if there is such a thing, would take place in a normal economy and in a time of international uncertainty, but not war. The 2000 election might qualify, although the presence of a third-party candidate interfered somewhat with "laboratory conditions." The electorate divided 50-50 in that one.
Demographic changes may have tilted the playing field somewhat in favor of the Democrats. But when all is said and done, I don't think we're too far from being a "50-50" nation.
Kill the bill
Congratulations to Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann for her rally against Obamacare yesterday in Washington. Called on short notice, the event appears to have been a great success. One of the highlights was Jon Voight's heartfelt remarks at the event (video below), including his tribute to Michele.
Rep. Bachmann is smart, beautiful and conservative. I first met her when she was running for the state senate seat representing Stillwater, Minnesota, after she knocked off the liberal Republican incumbent for the party endorsement in 2000 (I think). I was blown away by her presentation. As far as I can tell, she lives her beliefs. She drives Democrats and their media wing nuts. May she go from strength to strength.
Via Big Hollywood.
Democrats' Civil War, Continued
Byron York has been following MoveOn.org's effort to enforce left-wing conformity on the Democratic Party. The latest news is that MoveOn has raised nearly $3.6 million to defeat any Senate Democrat who has the temerity to vote against government takeover of health care. Then there's this:
And now, working in conjunction with Howard Dean's old organization Democracy for America, MoveOn is starting a drive to take away the committee chairmanships of any Democrat who fails to live up to MoveOn's progressive standards.
The Democrats' problem is compounded by the fact that not only most of the party's energy, but most of its money is on the far left. Perhaps the ill-fated Ned Lamont campaign was only the beginning, and we are about to witness an all-out attack on Democratic moderates.
No time for Sergant
Musician Gary Eaton has written a theme song for Yosi Sergant and the saga of the National Endowment for the Arts in the Age of Obama. The song is called "Yosi Needs a Hug." Big Hollywood has posted an audio clip of Eaton's engaging performance of the song here together with the song lyrics. Addressing Sergant's forced departure from the NEA, Eaton shows how the truth of a particular incident can illuminate a larger phenomenon. The chorus really scores:
Blame it on Glenn Beck
Blame it on Faux news
If that doesn't work
You can blame it on the Jews
What will Eaton do for an encore? Sergant's demise, which Eaton memorializes in the song, is already old news, even if the chorus remains timely. How about something for NEA chairman Rocco Landesman...maybe something along the lines of "Rocco Can Really Hang You Up the Most."
The war against Israel
Yesterday Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu held a press conference at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv on Tuesday's capture of the ship Francop that was smuggling a massive Iranian weapons cache to Syria for Iran's terrorist buddies. This was Netanyahu's statement:
First of all, I would like to commend Defense Minister Ehud Barak, IDF Chief-of-Staff Lt.-Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi, GOC Navy Adm. Eliezer Marom, GOC Intelligence Maj.-Gen. Amos Yadlin and the security and intelligence services of the State of Israel, including the Mossad, as well as the IDF soldiers and officers who carried out this very important action for Israel's security.
The navy captured a ship that was carrying a vast quantity of ordnance, which had been sent by the Iranian regime from the port of Bandar Abbas to Syria. From there it was due to be delivered to Hezbollah. The main component of this war materiel was rockets whose sole objective was to attack and kill as many civilians - women, children and the elderly - as possible.
This is a war crime. This is a war crime that the UN General Assembly, which is meeting today, should investigate, discuss and condemn. This is a war crime that should prompt the UN Security Council to convene in special session, especially since it was in gross violation of UN Security Council resolutions. This is a war crime which we know the Iranian regime intends to repeat, further arming Hezbollah, which has already fired thousands of missiles at our communities.
This is what the international community should concentrate on at all times but especially today. But instead, they have chosen to assemble and condemn the IDF and the State of Israel, and to try and undermine our legitimate right to defend ourselves.
I would like make it as clear as possible: This will neither deter us nor prevent us from continuing to act in order to defend Israeli citizens because Israeli citizens know the truth, that the IDF is a moral army without peer, either qualitatively or morally. We know that it is the IDF and the security services of the State of Israel that stand against the war criminals who plan to perpetrate war crimes against Israeli citizens.
I think that the time has come for the international community, at least its more responsible countries, to recognize the truth and not promote a lie.
Netanyahu alludes to the UN's obnoxious Goldstone report indicting Israel for its conduct in Operation Cast Lead. Last night Dore Gold debated Goldstone about the report at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts. Videos of the debate are posted here. Carl in Jerusalem live blogged the debate here. Ambassador Gold's presentation is below.
The UN is a central front in the war against Israel. It works relentlessly to delegitimize the state of Israel and the means of its self-defense. Goldstone is a useful idiot aiding and abetting the enemies of Israel. At the outset of his remarks, Gold shrewdly likens the Goldstone report to the UN's "Zionism is racism" resolution. Gold returns to the subject of the role played by the United Nations in the war against Israel in his final statement at the conclusion of the question and answer period.
The war against Israel continues. Today comes word that Iran has experimented with an advanced nuclear warhead design. The hour is late and the time for truth is overdue.
UPDATE: The Boston Globe reports on the Goldstone versus Gold debate. The New Republic has just posted a long critique of the Goldstone report by Moshe Halbertal under the heading "The Goldstone Illusion." Robert Goot's "A blind eye to Hamas atrocities" makes some basic points.
I should have noted that the UN General Assembly endorsed the Goldstone report yesterday by a vote of 114 to 18, with 44 abstentions. The United States voted "no."
JOHN adds: There is at least one place where Goldstone's message is heard and understood. This photo was taken in a souvenir shop in Gaza City:
About Fort Hood
It's hard to think of anything else today. Our thoughts and prayers are with those who were murdered and wounded by Major Hasan, and with their families. In trying to understand what happened, and is happening, I doubt one can do better today than to consider Bruce Bawer's "A day of courage and cowardice" and Victor Davis Hanson's "Fort Hood -- A now familiar horror."
JOHN adds: The story continues to dribble out. The latest is the inevitable "Allahu Akbar."
November 5, 2009
Team of the decade
Last night, the New York Yankees ended this decade of baseball the way they began it -- by winning the World Series. In between these triumphs, things didn't go quite as planned. However, when you sort it all out, the Yankees are the team of the decade, having appeared in four World Series, winning two. Their arch-rivals, the Red Sox, are runners-up. They won two titles, but played in only those two World Series.
The team of the decade honor is nothing new for the Yankees. By the measure used above, they were the team of the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, and 1990s. They were also second runners-up behind Oakland and Cincinnati in the 1970s, when they won two championships and appeared in three World Series.
Rounding out the list, the Chicago Cubs were the team of the 1900s, the Red Sox were the team of the 1910s, and the LA Dodgers -- the only two time champions of the 1980s -- were the team of that decade, though it didn't really seem that way.
Time to Stop This Fight
On Tuesday evening, the disparity between Fox News' ratings and those of its cable news competitors was remarkable:
More people watched Fox News than all of its cable news competitors combined, and CNN came in a dismal fourth. CNN's ratings have been in a tailspin. Shockingly, CNN finished October out of the list of the top 30 cable channels. Fox News, meanwhile, was the third highest-rated cable channel in prime time, after USA and ESPN.
Some might argue that Tuesday's ratings were skewed because it was mostly Republicans who were fired up about that day's elections. True enough, as the election results showed. But lots of Democrats watch Fox too--in fact, around 30 percent of Fox's audience are Democrats. A couple of nights ago we were watching Bill O'Reilly's show, and he pointed out that more Democrats watch Fox News than CNN and MSNBC combined, even though those networks cater almost exclusively to the left--one more reason why the Obama administration's attacks on Fox are painfully stupid.
For the foreseeable future, Fox News stands alone atop the world of cable news. If this were a boxing match, Fox vs. CNN, MSNBC and CNN Headline News, they would stop it: it's a TKO.
Least Cogent Commentary?
Earlier Paul described Sen. Lindsey Graham's observations on Tuesday's elections as the "least cogent commentary about New York-23" that he'd seen. Paul probably hadn't read this column by E.J. Dionne. Of Tuesday's results, Dionne, spinning furiously on behalf of his beloved Democratic Party, writes that "[t]he night's biggest loser was the national conservative political machine -- the wealthy tax-cutters at the Club for Growth and the Palin-Limbaugh-Beck complex."
Sometimes, all you can do is laugh. In his typically mean-spirited way, Dionne ascribes defeat to what in less pejorative language are called "conservatives." Yet conservatives won two big races Tuesday night. The only significant Democratic win was the result of a local committee's stubbing its toe by nominating a lousy Republican candidate.
Dionne makes much of the unique circumstances of NY 23, but has little to say about the far bigger races where voters rejected personal appeals by Barack Obama and turned two big states over to Republican governance. Dionne tries to make palatable these bitter defeats for his party by suggesting that Bob McDonnell won in Virginia by appealing to moderates and independents. While not quite signing on to the absurdity of David Axelrod's claim that McDonnell ran "not as a Sarah Palin Republican, but more as a Barack Obama centrist," Dionne nevertheless says that Axelrod's "point was right."
But wait! Is this the same Bob McDonnell who, until Tuesday night, was a far-right candidate determined to chain women to their stoves? In September, Dionne wrote that McDonnell was a "onetime protege of Pat Robertson" who once wrote a paper, "unearthed by the Washington Post," that argued:
...that working mothers were detrimental to the family and that he opposed a Supreme Court decision legalizing contraception for married couples. He had some less than kind words about homosexuals.
Dionne was willing to turn this supposed Neanderthal into a moderate--almost "a Barack Obama centrist!"--in order to avoid admitting the unacceptable, that Tuesday's elections were a big win for conservatives.
It's true, of course, that conservatives Bob McDonnell and Chris Christie appealed, successfully, to moderates and independents. That was, indeed, the big story of the election. But this doesn't mean that conservatives were the "big losers," it means the Democrats are in trouble because conservative ideas, for now at least, resonate better with independents than the far-left nonsense we are seeing from the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress.
UPDATE: Michael Ramirez skewers Nancy Pelosi's claim, closely allied to Dionne's commentary, that Tuesday was a big win for the far left; click to enlarge:
PAUL adds: John is right on both counts: I had not read Dionne's column and his take is even less cogent than Sen. Graham's.
I did read an earlier Dionne column in which he argued that the lesson of Tuesday was going to be that all Democrats should embrace President Obama. At that time ,most polls had Corzine ahead while Deeds, of course, was behind. Dionne attributed this to the fact that Corzine had embraced Obama, whereas Deeds had been reluctant to.
In the end, both Democrats lost. Corzine's race was closer. But then, New Jersey is an extremely blue state and Virginia is not blue at all. Which, of course, is why Corzine wanted to associate himself with Obama to a greater degree than Deeds did.
Massacre at Fort Hood
The question, obviously, is whether it was a terrorist attack, or just a disgruntled soldier who snapped. The gunman who murdered at least eleven people has been identified as Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a psychiatrist who has been working at Walter Reed and was scheduled to be deployed to Iraq.
There have been reports that two other men were taken into custody, but they now have apparently been released. It's also being reported that a third man has been picked up for questioning. This seems odd, if Hasan was a lone gunman. If others were involved it presumably could suggest a terrorist attack. At present, though, there is no strong evidence of others' participation.
UPDATE: It's now being reported that Hasan, a Muslim, posted favorable comments about suicide bombers on a web site. All of this is just one step above rumor, for now, however.
FURTHER UPDATE: A Lt. General giving a press conference says that, contrary to earlier reports, Major Hasan is alive. He also confirms that three other people have been taken into custody and interviewed, but says that indications are that Hasan was a "single shooter."
MORE: The Associated Press reports that Hasan was investigated six months ago because of internet postings that praised Islamic suicide bombers:
One of the Web postings that authorities reviewed is a blog that equates suicide bombers with a soldier throwing himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades.
"To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its (sic) more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause," said the Internet posting. "Scholars have paralled (sic) this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers."
Again, this information is preliminary at best, especially since there are indications that two doctors, the shooter and someone completely unrelated, share the same name. More will be known before long.
ANOTHER: The denizens of the Daily Kos weigh in from their perverse, anti-American perspective.
LAST ONE FOR TONIGHT: The Associated Press has a surprisingly balanced story on the murders, titled "Troubling protrait emerges of Army psychiatrist suspected in rampage at Fort Hood, Texas." It includes this item:
On a form filled out by those seeking spouses through a program at the mosque, Hasan listed his birthplace as Arlington, Va., but his nationality as Palestinian, Khan said.
"I don't know why he listed Palestinian," Khan said, "He was not born in Palestine."
