The oddest news item of the last couple of days was the EPA’s release of a paper on global warming that undercut the Administration’s position, followed by the President’s observation that the paper had been ground out by “the bureaucracy” and didn’t represent a change in position. I don’t get it: I know the President isn’t omnipotent and has to pick his fights with the bureaucRATS, but still, can’t Bush tell Christie Whitman to follow the Administration’s line (which, by the way, is clearly correct) on global warming? Is this another example of the Administration’s use of creative ambiguity? Or is it just confusion?
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.