Oliver North has a hilarious

Oliver North has a hilarious column comparing Secretary Powell’s presentation to the UN with the OJ trial: “The OJ trial at the UN.” North concludes as follows: “In the O.J. trial, Cochran made much of the fact that no murder weapon was ever found and convinced a jury of 12 to let O.J. off the hook. The evidence on Saddam is now before a ‘jury’ of 15 in the UN. President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair need to act soon, before Dominique de Villepin persuades them that the Scud doesn’t fit — and they vote to acquit.”
David Brooks expands on this point in his piece on the Weekly Standard’s Web site: “French Kiss-Off.” Is it wrong to hope that the French hold to their position and therefore assist us in drawing the correct conclusions about the absurdity, irrelevance and odiousness of the UN? Just asking.

Responses

Books to read from Power Line