This piece from National Review Online suggests, based on polling data, that the Britons are not as intractably opposed to military action against Iraq as we have been led to believe. Apparently, the polls show that a majority would favor such military action if it garners majority support in the Security Council, even if several members exercise a veto. Of course, it’s far from clear now that even a majority of Security Council members will support attacking Saddam. But if the British people are okay with attacking Saddam under that condition prior to any attack, they may well be okay with doing so absent that condition after a successful attack. What people will think after the attack is, of course, far more important than what people think now. In fact, what people think now will be altogether irrelevant in a few months.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.