The Washington Times reports that one of the operations assigned to special operations forces is the location and preservation of the records of Iraq’s intelligence service(s): “Mission aims to find intelligence agency’s files.” In the New York Times, Ibrahim Al-Marashi details the kind of materials included in these files: “Just following (Saddam Hussein’s) orders.”
In the Washington Post, Ralph Peters outlines a critique of our war strategy: “Shock, awe and overconfidence.” In the New York Post, however, he defends our war planning from the armchair critics with considerable irritation: “No Baghdad bloodbath.”
Unfortunately, it appears that conservative commenatators are the only ones interested in pursuing the story of Asan Akbar. Daniel Pipes has a good column in the New York Post: “Murder in the 101st Airborne.” David Horowitz adds some interesting facts as well, including Akbar’s pre-Muslim name (Mark Fidel Kools) and the fact that his denomination is the religion of hatred known as Black Muslim: “Black Muslim traitors.” Isn’t this news?
The Wall Street Journal has a good news roundup on the war that suggests the historic nature of the battle coming up with the Republican Guard: “The next crucial hurdle for Iraq’s liberation.”
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.