Today’s United Press International headline: “Analysis: Victory beckons U.S. troops”. UPI’s Chief International Correspondent writes:
“Coalition forces were on the brink of a stunning military victory in the battle of Baghdad Wednesday, as U.S. troops drove forward from the southeast and southwest against slackening Iraqi resistance….
“A stunning victory now beckons for the U.S. forces that would silence the critics inside and outside the Pentagon and vindicate the battle plan of coalition commander Gen. Tommy Franks. The defeat of the [Republican Guard] outside Baghdad would deprive the city of its best-trained potential defenders. This could have a dramatic impact on the much-feared siege of the city with its grim prospects of high civilian and U.S. casualties in street fighting.”
UPI’s analysis emphasizes the question we have puzzled over for some time: Why did the Iraqi government station the Republican Guard so far south of Baghdad? Republican Guard units now face a choice between being killed where they stand, and being slaughtered on the road if they try to retreat toward Baghdad.
In any event, it is curious to see how rapidly our journalists move from despair to glee. The current mood is probably more realistic than the pessimism of day before yesterday, but I expect much more hard fighting before our “stunning military victory” is complete.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.