George Bush the elder was perhaps the worst politician to attain the presidency in the twentieth century, although Jimmy Carter was certainly a close rival in that regard. It nevertheless appears that Bush would have won reelection in 1992 were it not for Ross Perot’s independent candidacy or for Casper Weinberger’s indictment by an utterly unscrupulous Independent Counsel the weekend before the election.
Is it plausible that George Bush the younger will lose to a Democratic challenger in wartime? I don’t think so. I find the media excitement over the Democratic contest and George Bush’s alleged vulnerability to be little more than the projection of a wish.
Now comes David Winston in today’s Roll Call to provide some support for these thoughts: “No comparison: Bush poll numbers beat Bill Clinton’s.”
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
Most Read on Power Line
- The Week in Pictures: Special Al Franken Edition
- On blue slips, Grassley pulls the trigger
- How Al Franken Sees Himself, and How Others See Him
- Kirsten Gillibrand's intellectual dishonesty [UPDATED]
- Gloria Allred won't allow inspection of yearbook
- It wasn't "the times" that caused feminists to give Bill Clinton a pass
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell