Spencer Ackerman of the New Republic tells us that he’s an Orson Welles look-alike who is trying to usurp the position of Grand Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani by calling for and leading an uprising against the U.S. Sistani opposes the uprising both because he thinks it’s bad idea and because it’s Sadr’s deal. The stakes could hardly be higher, both for the two Shia leaders and for the U.S. With the U.S. now gunning for Sadr, Sistani seems to hold the better hand, but it depends on whether the Shia rank-and-file continue to accept his restained approach. Ackerman notes, for example, that “if Sadr is ‘martyred’ by the United States, Shia Iraqis may subsequently ask why their grand ayatollah didn’t challenge the U.S. as forcefully.” On the other hand, they may ask why, after the U.S. had liberated them from decades of oppression, an uprising was a better idea than getting on with building a new Iraq.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.