Michael Rubin argues, convincingly I think, that the “Fallujah experiment” has failed and should be put to an end. As Rubin explains: “Former Iraqi army officers have failed in their promise to apprehend those guilty of the mutilation of four American civilian contractors on March 31. Rather than expel foreign fighters, the Fallujah Brigade protects them. The Brigade has also not affected the surrender of heavy weapons. Meanwhile, free from the pressure of the siege, insurgents in Fallujah have regrouped, reequipped, and reorganized in the run-up to the June 30 transfer of sovereignty.”
Rubin also argues that failure of the Baathist generals to promote our goals in Fallujah undercuts the conventional wisdom that it was a mistake to dissolve the Iraqi military. It seems to me that our success in the Shiite south may also undercut that “wisdom.” For I question whether the Shiite uprising would have petered out as it has if Sunni Baathists were in charge of an Iraqi army.
Most Read on Power Line
- Why You Should Be Sympathetic Toward Cliven Bundy
- Today's IRS Documents: What Do They Show?
- Standoff at Bundy Ranch Ends, With Photo of the Year So Far
- The War On Standards Comes to College Debate [with comment by Paul]
- Is Scott Walker on his way to 2016 front-runner status?
- At Dartmouth, Phil Hanlon wants no enemies to the left
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell