Coming from John Fogerty and the Credence Clearwater Revival, “Fortunate Son” is a song with a point that had undeniable power in 1968. Fogerty himself was from the other side of the tracks in Berkeley, California, and when he sang the song he poured himself into it.
Today’s AP story on the Kerry campaign’s use of the “Fortunate Son” theme against President Bush is of interest. The story observes that the Kerry campaign is “painting an unflattering portrait of President Bush as the ‘fortunate son’ who used family connections to dodge the Vietnam War and then lied about it.”
It strikes me that there are a few problems with the theme under present circumstances. “Fortunate Son” is a Vietnam-era protest song; the song bears on Kerry’s antiwar activities at least as much as on President Bush’s service in the Air National Guard. I doubt that the song or the theme plays to Kerry’s strength or Bush’s weakness. Moreover, given Bush’s performance as president over his term in office, the theme is vacuous.
In a political context the “Fortunate Son” theme depends on a kind of class resentment that generally fails to resonate with average Americans. Does it ring the bell coming from an obvious patrician like John Kerry? Or as a gibe against a regular guy like President Bush?
Last question. Am I the only one who is prompted by the theme of unearned bounty in “Fortunate Son” to consider John Kerry the “Fortunate Husband”?
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.