The return of Bobby Jindal

We were sorely disappointed last November when Republican Bobby Jindal narrowly lost to Democrat Kathleen Blanco in his Louisiana gubernatorial bid. Jindal is a 33-year-old wunderkind — a policy wonk with degrees from Brown and Oxford — whose parents emigrated from India to Baton Rouge before he was born.
We celebrated the emergence of “Bubbas for Bobby” in the course of last year’s campaign (see “Here comes Bobby Jindal, we hope”), and in “Breaking down the Louisiana vote” we took a look at the voting patterns underlying Jindal’s loss. We also quoted at length from the terrific profile of Jindal by Fred Barnes for the Weekly Standard:

Jindal has an extraordinary life story. His given first name is Piyush, but at age 4 he decided to change it to Bobby. In high school, he abandoned his parents’ Hindu faith and converted to Catholicism. (His father is an engineer, his mother an assistant secretary in the Louisiana state labor department.) By the time he graduated from Baton Rouge High School, Jindal was a Republican. When he got to Brown–an eight-year medical program had attracted him–he naively asked about joining the College Republicans. There was no chapter at Brown. The Republican club Jindal subsequently helped found grew, he says, to 300 members, a surprisingly large membership for a liberal Ivy League school.
His post-Brown career has been dizzying. Instead of pursuing medicine, Jindal studied at Oxford for two years as a Rhodes Scholar, worked the next two years for McKinsey, the business consulting firm, and at age 24 returned to Baton Rouge to take over, at Foster’s urging, the mammoth Department of Health and Hospitals. There, he transformed a $400 million deficit into a $220 million surplus…
He’s issued lengthy position papers on health care, ethics, economic opportunity, the environment, schools, and religious faith. These were packaged together last week in a glossy 24-page booklet entitled “The Jindal Blueprint for Louisiana–A Bold New Vision.” Most notable is the section on “defending the role of faith and values in our state.” In it, he tells how a friend led him to Christian faith. “Today, my faith in Jesus Christ is central to who I am, and I pray regularly for God’s wisdom in all the parts of my life,” he says.
Jindal says he became a Republican as a teenager for two reasons. In Louisiana, with its history of political corruption, Republicans are the reform party. Also, they’re the champions of opportunity. “I’d seen what great opportunity my father had [in America] as an engineer,” he said in an interview. His mother has succeeded in state government, he said, and “I’m running for governor. This is an amazing country.”
As Yogi Berra said of the election of a Jewish mayor of Dublin, “Only in America.”

Today reader Steve Cochran writes from Lake Charles, Louisiana to point out to us that Jindal edged his rivals for election to Congress in Louisiana’s First Congressional District on Tuesday night with a mere 78 percent of the vote. The Economic Times previewed Jindal’s election in “Bobby Jindal set to be the only Indian-American in US Congress.” Something tells me that we’re going to be hearing more from Congressman-elect Jindal.
Below is a photo of Jindal and his supporters that we posted folllowing his emergence in the Louisiana gubernatorial primary last year.
Jindal.jpg
Mr. Cochran’s residence in Lake Charles reminds me that when The Band portrayed paradise in the song “Up On Cripple Creek,” Lake Charles was the location:

When I get off of this mountain, you know where I want to go?
Straight down the Mississippi river, to the Gulf of Mexico,
To Lake Charles, Louisiana, little Bessie, girl that I once knew.
She told me just to come on by, if there’s anything she could do.
Up on Cripple Creek she sends me,
If I spring a leak she mends me.
I don’t have to speak, she defends me…
A drunkard’s dream if I ever did see one.

Perfect music (well, sort of) by which to celebrate Jindal’s election…

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses