about the Supreme Court’s decision in the juvenile death penalty case. When the Court looks to European standards on these sorts of issues, it is not looking to any meaningful societal consensus. The abolition of the death penalty in Europe generally occurred in the face of public opinion that favored the penalty, and (based on the polls I’ve seen) probably still does. And it’s doubtful that decisions to ratify international covenants on the subject involve much public consideration either.
Thus, when our robed masters find confirmation in Europe of their views about what is decent and what is “cruel and unusual,” they are relying on the views of a very narrow segment of European opinion — essentially the prejudices of the folks with whom they schmooze on their summer junkets to the continent.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.