Red-state Senate Democrats, particularly those up for re-election next year, are tilting in favor of John Roberts, reports the Washington Post. One such Democrat, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, says, “I am impressed with [Roberts’] demeanor, his sense of humor, his modesty. Absent some bombshell, which I don’t expect, I think he will be confirmed and quite handily.”
The Post also notes that for every three Americans who think less favorably of Roberts as they’ve heard more, four Americans view him more favorably. That’s bad news for NARAL, NOW, and People for the American Way, who appear to be wasting their money. And conservatives can take heart from the fact that most of the post-nomination substantive news about Roberts has tended to show him as staunchly conservative, although it’s not clear that it’s this news that’s improving his standing.
The Post’s Jim VandeHei reports that some Democratic strategists believe Roberts could win the votes of 80 Senators, which would mean a majority of the Democrats. Two days ago, I would have said this is probably unrealistic. However, with it now clear that another nominee will follow right on the heels of Roberts, many Blue-state Democrats may be inclined to hold their fire so as to maintain their credibility in case President’s Bush’s next nominee is more vulnerable.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.