Counting the votes

Polipundit counts the votes of 50-54 Senators in favor of Judge Alito’s confirmation: “The roll call vote.” But what about the votes on a cloture motion, Mr. Polipundit? How goes the gang of 14?

Pending his tabulation of votes on a putative cloture motion, Polipundit directs us to Ed Whelan’s ringing endorsement of Judge Alito’s nomination: “Congratulations, President Bush!” Whelan writes:

In selecting Third Circuit judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. for the Supreme Court, President Bush has made a truly outstanding nomination that deserves widespread acclaim. By any objective criteria, it is doubtful that there is anyone now or in recent decades (yes, not even Chief Justice Roberts) whose experience and qualifications better prepare him for the Supreme Court.

Judge Alito’s entire career since graduating from Yale Law School in the mid-1970s has been devoted to public service in the law. His range of experience dealing with difficult questions of federal law is unmatched. After a prestigious clerkship on the Third Circuit, he worked as a federal prosecutor in New Jersey for four years. Then, as assistant to the Solicitor General, he briefed and argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court for four years. He next served as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel—the office that was previously headed by Rehnquist and Scalia and that advises the White House Counsel’s office and the entire executive branch on the proper meaning of the Constitution and other federal law. In 1987, Alito became United States Attorney in New Jersey. In that capacity, he was responsible for all federal prosecutions in New Jersey for three years (including the successful prosecution of a Libyan-sponsored terrorist who planned to attack various New York targets). And for the past 15 years, Alito has served with great distinction on the Third Circuit.

Just as the Left attacked Roberts, it will attack Alito. But President Bush has again selected an outstanding nominee whose intellect, character, experience, and, not least, proper understanding of the role of the courts will earn the deep respect of the American people and of all fair-minded observers.

JOHN adds: Alito is a solid choice. Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid have already come out against him; another good sign. I’m a little surprised to see that People for the American Way doesn’t seem to have anything on Alito on their web site. PFAW has not yet reacted to the nomination.

UPDATE: PFAW has now sent out a press release attacking Alito:

Neas said that People For the American Way will mobilize its 750,000 members and activists to wage a massive national effort to defeat Alito’s nomination and will work closely with its coalition partners to educate Americans about the threats posed by this nomination.

We’re about to get the fight over Constitutional principles that conservatives have looked forward to for years.

ANOTHER UPDATE: PFAW has put out a “preliminary report” on Judge Alito which you can access here. PFAW approaches Judge Alito’s record with its usual balance and nuance:

As the following summaries of his opinions reveal, the judicial philosophy of Samuel Alito is far to the right. In fact, he has been given the nickname “Scalito” by some who practice before him and liken him to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. … It is clear that Alito’s confirmation would seriously jeopardize Americans’ rights.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses