Bush administration critics sometimes say that our military is playing “whack-a-mole” in Iraq, moving troops from one troubled area to another, only to see trouble to reappear in the areas from which we have moved them. Most of these critics are not arguing in good faith — they’re vexed not that we’re whacking too few moles but that we’re whacking any.
Nonetheless, there seems to be some truth to the criticism, as this story in the Washington Times about al Qaeda’s growing strength in Ramadi and other parts of Anbar province suggests. As I’ve said before, our most compelling reason for remaining in Iraq is to prevent al Qaeda from gaining a territorial foothold. Therefore, it strikes me as imperative that we deal promptly with the situation in the Ramadi area, either by pulling troops out of Baghdad or sending additional troops to Iraq, as Senator McCain advocates.
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
Most Read on Power Line
- A sign of things to come in the Democratic party
- NOAA Caught Rewriting US Temperature History (Again)
- Blaming Pamela Geller
- Bill Clinton's howlers cast doubt on his usefulness to Hillary
- The Telos of Liberalism: Your Children's Bedtime Stories
- The war on standards makes major headway in New York City
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell