A non-column on a non-scandal

The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson claims to have identified the “hallmark” of the Bush administration — its “arrogance.” I think I’ve discovered the hallmark of hack liberal columnists — level allegations of arrogance when you’re too lazy or incompetent to provide any analysis.
Robinson considers it “arrogant” of the administration to have fired eight U.S. attorneys. But there’s nothing arrogant about replacing prosecutors who either weren’t performing well in general or weren’t prosecuting certain types of crimes the administration justifiably considered important.
Of course, it might be the case that some of the eight prosecutors don’t actually fit that description. Or there might be other evidence that shows the proffered reasons for the firings to be pretexts. But making that case would require effort and analysis. And Eugene Robinson, hands down the Washington Post’s worst columnist, doesn’t do effort or analysis.
To comment on this post, go here.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses