The NR challenge

I’m taking a break at a continuing legal education program where I’m fulfilling the requirement of the Minnesota rules to get my mind right by taking two hours on “the elimination of bias” in the legal profession. It’s a program on alcoholism and addiction in the legal profession. Is there bias against alcholics in the profession? Not so far as I can tell, and not much bias of any other kind either, except perhaps of the kind that expresses itself as disdain for conservatives and Republicans.
I note that the editors of National Review have challenged the editors of the Wall Street Journal to a debate on the merits of the proposed immigration bill. NR writes:

We hereby challenge the Journal

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses