That’s what CNN says. Their latest national poll shows Hillary Clinton leading Barack Obama by 49% to 36%, with John Edwards trailing with 12%. On the Republican side, CNN has McCain jumping out to a substantial lead with 34% of the vote, followed by Huckabee at 21%–those are words I never thought I’d type–Guiliani at 18% and Romney at 14%. (Via Real Clear Politics.) Such, perhaps, is the dramatic consequence of New Hampshire.
Well, maybe. But count me as a skeptic. CNN interviewed a grand total of 443 Democrats and 397 Republicans. And these were registered voters, not likely voters, let alone voters who are likely to vote in a primary. Talking to 400 Republicans scattered across the United States, probably 75% or more of whom won’t vote in a primary or attend a caucus, doesn’t give us much guidance.
Still, the primary season so far does teach some lessons. The issues that caused Republican activists to write McCain off six month ago–illegal immigration, taxes and campaign finance–evidently don’t have the same weight in the world at large. Voters have always chosen Presidents mostly by sizing up the man (or person, this year). Character generally trumps, within a pretty broad range, policy preferences. And, frustrating as this orientation may be to those who focus on policy, history suggests that the voters’ focus on character is usually wise.
To comment on this post, go here.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.