In April New York Times reporter Mark Leibovich examined the degrees of disloyalty perceived by the Clintons among their former friends, appointees, retainers, and Democratic officeholders in “Clintons sort friends: Past and present.” I used Leibovich’s column to reflect on the “Clintons’ Inferno.” With the primary season now concluded, Leibovich returns to the subject for an update in “Those loyal to the Clintons take note of those who were not.” Except for the fact that the Clintons now have some spare time to stew about it, not much has changed in the intervening two months.
To comment on this post go here.
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.