Diana West has responded to my latest post in our debate about the Iraq surge and its implications for the surge in Afghanistan. This was my first post about the subject. Diana responded here. Then I wrote this post, which Diana now addresses.
In essence, the view I expressed in my two posts is that the surge in Iraq was a relative success because it did most of the things we intended it do, and could reasonably have expected it to do, and was better than the alternative. These, I think, are the most relevant considerations in assessing the surge. The latter point, in particular, is probably the most relevant one in trying to assess what to do under somewhat comparable circumstances in Afghanistan.
This view is debatable, of course, as Diana has shown. But on this blog, all debates come to an end, at least temporarily. Consistent with my usual practice, Diana gets the last word.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.