That was Tom Delay’s take on his conviction for alleged money laundering last week. No surprise there.
But it also happens to be the take of the Washington Post’s board of editors. They point out that in Texas, as elsewhere, money laundering is defined as knowingly using “the proceeds of criminal activity.” Typically, that means cash from drug deals or the like.
In Delay’s case, as I understand it, he directed money from his political action committee to the Republican National Committee, along with a list of candidates for the Texas state legislature and how much each was to receive. Delay’s PAC money had been donated by corporations.
Since it was legal for the corporations to contribute money to Delay’s PAC, the Post finds it difficult to see how Delay used “the proceeds of criminal activity.” Thus, it concludes, correctly in my view, that “when Mr. Delay, following the conviction, assailed ‘the criminalization of politics,’ he had a fair point.”
Most Read on Power Line
- Why You Should Be Sympathetic Toward Cliven Bundy
- Today's IRS Documents: What Do They Show?
- Standoff at Bundy Ranch Ends, With Photo of the Year So Far
- The War On Standards Comes to College Debate [with comment by Paul]
- Is Scott Walker on his way to 2016 front-runner status?
- At Dartmouth, Phil Hanlon wants no enemies to the left
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell