President Obama has re-nominated to the federal bench four individuals who were too controversial to be confirmed by the outgoing Senate. The four are Goodwin Liu, Edward Chen, Louis Butler, and John O’Donnell.
We have discussed Liu’s radicalism on several occasions. Hans Bader highlights the problems that stood in the way of the confirmation of the four, even by an overwhelmingly Democratic Senate.
It’s difficult to see how any of the four – especially Liu – can be confirmed by the more conservative, more Republican incoming Senate. The question thus becomes, why did Obama re-nominate the four.
The answer, at least in the case of Liu, must be that Obama’s lefty base wanted him to keep fighting for their champion. I know the feeling – I wanted President Bush to stick with some of his nominees even after it became almost certain they could not be confirmed.
But the cost of re-nominating losing nominees is that the judicial seats they cannot fill remain unfilled. So when Obama and his supporters complain about the number of judicial vacancies caused by obstruction in the Senate, let’s remember that he is contributing to the problem by putting his desire to grandstand for the base ahead of the business of populating the federal bench.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.