So I’ve got a lot of idle jottings and thoughts piling up from the week, and need a place to get them out. Twitter is too short.
I’m puzzled: liberals says conservatives don’t like Darwin, but then they say we’re all a bunch of “Social Darwinists.” Something doesn’t add up here. Well, at least there’s one form of Darwinism that liberals disapprove.
To be sure, I will admit that most conservatives prefer Jay Gould to Stephen Jay Gould. But I think what’s really going on here is more projection. Who was it who said we ought to have a “Darwinian” Constitution? Woodrow Wilson. Among others.
Was the Titanic the anti-Noah’s Ark? That’s one of the questions Pascal Bruckner planted with me earlier this week.
Jim Manzi, a blazingly successful entrepreneur and author of the terrific book Uncontrolled: The Surprising Payoff of Trial-and-Error for Business, Politics, and Society, remarked the other day about the subject of innovation that “If there’s already a name for what you’re trying to do, you’re not really innovating. . . Real innovators should be doing something all the ‘experts’ think is stupid.” I like that.
Finally, here’s a link to my turn on the Kudlow Report last Monday afternoon, talking about climate change and Obama’s climate speech. The link seems to be a bit twitchy, though.
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.