One question for Chuck Lane

Washington Post opinion writer Chuck Lane apparently concurs with David Bernstein’s 40 questions for the international media in Gaza, posted on the Volokh Conspiracy site hosted by the Post itself. The Post seems to concur that these are important questions, but advises us not to expect any answers. One question for Chuck Lane: Why?

A few more questions: Aren’t you in a rather good position to get answers? Are the Post’s reporters and editors unavailable for comment? Has a cat got their tongue? What gives?

I gather from Lane that the Post at least acknowledges the questions. On this front we have yet to hear from CNN, FOX News Channel, the Wall Street Journal and the rest of the American media with their men in Gaza.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses