Author Archives: Paul Mirengoff

One happy Deacon

I can’t express how happy I am to be back at Power Line.  I’m grateful to John, Scott, and Joe Malchow for their friendship and moral support during the past 15 months, and for holding a place at the blog for me. I also thank Steve Hayward for filling the gap I left, and then some.  It’s quite an honor to be replaced by someone of Steve’s stature, learning, and ability.  I’m »

Farewell and thank you

I have made the decision to discontinue blogging at this time. I thank John and Scott for bringing me along on this ride and I thank our readers as well. I couldn’t have hoped for better writing partners or for better readers. Best regards to all. »

A reince not a RINO

Yesterday, the Republican National Committee elected Reince Priebus as its chairman. I tried to follow the hotly contested race for this post, but couldn’t sustain an interest; this was truly inside baseball. I know three things about Priebus, all positive. First, he isn’t Michael Steele. Second, he was successful as head of the GOP in Wisconsin and received the backing of newly elected Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson. Third, he gained »

Eisenhower’s farewell address and the demise of prudentialism

Monday marks the 50th anniversary of President Eisenhower’s farewell address. At the time, it didn’t draw nearly as much attention as John Kennedy’s inaugural address delivered three days later. These days, however, Eisenhower’s speech is probably considered about as noteworthy. That’s mainly because the left loves to quote Ike’s warning about dangers of the “military-industrial complex.” There’s much more to the speech than just that passage, however. Ted Bromund finds »

Sarah Palin and the “blood libel”

Sarah Palin is coming in for criticism for using the term “blood libel” to describe accusations that she and other outspoken conservatives somehow have blood on their hands in connection with the Tucson shootings. Palin’s remarks on the shootings are also being compared unfavorably to President Obama’s speech at the University of Arizona. Obama’s speech was healing and uplifting, while Palin’s, some say, was divisive and defensive. I find both »


In a post last night, I criticized the use of a Yaqui prayer as the invocation to the memorial service in Tucson. In doing so, I failed to give the prayer the respect it deserves. Although I did not intend this as a slight to the religion or to the Yaqui tribe, it can clearly be interpreted as one. For this, I sincerely apologize to my readers, to the Yaqui »

The president’s speech, Part Two

The conservative commentary I’ve seen about President Obama’s speech of last night has been laudatory, and rightly so in my view. For example, Peter Wehner, who knows a thing or two about presidential speeches, writes that last night “Mr. Obama was president of all the people and spoke beautifully for them.” Pete also makes the key point that “the president used the occasion to essentially close an ugly and unfortunate »

The president’s speech

Tonight, in my estimation, President Obama delivered a brilliant, spellbinding, and fitting speech about the Tucson shootings. This was the best speech I’ve ever heard him give. It can be divided into three parts – a tribute to the victims, a denunciation of attempts to use the incident to make partisan attacks, and a related call for more civility in politics. In making these points, Obama steered away from what »

U.S. K-12 education — how bad?

We frequently read about how poorly the United States does when it comes to K-12 education. Our educational system is said, based on this or that study, to be lagging behind those of other developed nations, thus placing our economic competitiveness at risk. As with certain other metrics through which the U.S. is sometimes compared unfavorably to other countries, I always wonder whether the comparisons that find our education system »

What respectable liberalism looks like

The Washington Post editorial board parts company with the general run of liberal commentary about the Tucson shooting spree by eschewing attempts to blame a madman’s actions on “a vitriolic political culture laced with violent metaphors. . . .” The Post notes: Politicians should choose their words with care and keep debate civil, but it seems an unsupported leap to blame either the political climate or any particular individual or »

A look at baseball’s latest Hall of Fame selectees

Last week, Bert Blyleven and Roberto Alomar were voted into baseball’s Hall of Fame. I consider both to be legitimate, albeit second-tier, Hall of Famers. The way I see the Hall, anyone in the top ten all time at his position deserves to be selected. We’re talking, after all, about 100 plus years of modern baseball history. For starting pitchers, by the same reasoning, I think anyone in the top »

Obamacare as debt-reduction legislaton

For the past few weeks, Democrats have been arguing against the repeal of Obamacare on the grounds that the program is a debt-reduction measure. The argument is hard to take seriously, so I haven’t addressed it, though I’ve provided links to some who have. But the Dems have been so persistent with this claim that perhaps it’s time to analyze it. I see three problems with defending Obamacare as a »

Has our political discourse taken a “dangerous turn”?

As Scott notes in a post below, “the race is on to place Jared Loughner among conservatives and attribute responsibility for yesterday’s murders to the political opponents of President Obama.” Less irresponsible precincts of the left are making the related argument that, as the first paragraph of the Washington Post’s lead story puts it, the shooting spree has “raised serious concerns that the nation’s heated political discourse has taken a »

A flame that can’t be extingushed and a marriage that should not be saved

When NPR sacked top news executive Ellen Weiss earlier this week, Juan Williams (whom Weiss had sacked) called her the representative of the “very ingrown, incestuous culture” at NPR. He also said her departure is “good news for NPR and people who care about the news.” Unfortunately, “NPR” and “people who care about the news” as other than a vehicle for advancing a political agenda may be, for the most »

We’re the government and we’re here to claim we helped you

Yesterday, President Obama visited the production plant of Thompson Creek, a window manufacturing company in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, DC. The Thompson Creek name is well known to anyone who listens to sports on the radio in the DC area. Today, for example, I heard its ad while listening to a playoff football game on the way home from work. Thompson Creek has grown substantially in the past two »

Rearranging the deck chairs

The appointment of William Daley as President Obama’s chief-of-staff has drawn plenty of comment. It is widely viewed as an important signal that Obama is tacking towards the poiltical center. That may be where Obama is tacking, but I’m not convinced that this is the meaning, or will be the consequence, of the Daley appointment. When it comes to matters of ideology, Obama will continue to be his own chief-of-staff. »

Disowning the constitution

Charles Krauthammer begins his important column about “Constitutionalism” this way: For decades, Democrats and Republicans fought over who owns the American flag. Now they’re fighting over who owns the Constitution. But, as Krauthammer suggests later in his column, what was remarkable this week is that some Democrats, rather than fighting over who owns the Constitution, were publicly disowning it — in some cases symbolically and in others substantively. »