Despite the fact that I do it for a living, I have very limited faith in the ability of litigation to bring about justice or, in general, improve the world. In particular, I am pretty universally opposed to litigation that is intended to advance a cause or act as a surrogate for legislation, or serve any other purpose beyond seeking money on behalf of the plaintiff. The just-announced lawsuit by heirs of September 11victims may be an exception to that rule. They say their purpose is to “force the sponsors of terror into the light” and to “expose the extent, the depth, the orchestration, the financial support that terrorist organizations have received for perhaps a decade from various Saudi interests.” Good luck to them. Litigation is obviously no substitute for military action, but it may prove a useful adjunct. Hell hath no fury like an American lawyer working for a contingent fee.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.