This Washington Times editorial considers President Bush’s statement that, once Saddam Hussein is removed, Israel and the Palestinians will be able to implement Bush’s “road map” for Mideast peace. Bush has decreed that, “as the terror threat is removed and security improves,” Israel will be expected to support the creation of a Palestinian state, move towards a final-status agreement, and end “settlement activity” in the occupied territories. The Times points to the real world obstacles to this scenario, the primary one being the fact that “there is no evidence that the Palestinian masses are prepared to compromise with Israel” and therefore no reason why Israel should make any concessions. Plainly, Bush has no legitimate basis for believing that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein will lead to a change in the rejectionist philosophy of the Palestinians. Indeed, Bush’s statements suggesting that Israel will be expected to support the creation of a Palestinian state will only ensure that the Palestinians continue to embrace that philosophy. The Palestinians are counting on Bush to lean on Israel in order to mollify Arab states and the “Arab street” (not to mention Europe) in the aftermath of an attack on, and occupation of, Iraq. If Bush accommodates them, and I believe he will, Israel will face extraordinary peril, and one terrorist-supporting Middle East dictatorship will be replaced by another.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.