This Washington Post editorial exposes the dishonesty of the latest Democratic spin on the Estrada nomination. The Democrats now try to justify their extraordinary filibuster of an indisputably qualified nominee by claiming that Estrada would not answer questions about his judicial philosophy during his confirmation hearing last fall. But the Post reminds us that, in fact, the Democrats asked Estrada virtually no questions about the basic methodological issues that divide the judiciary. Indeed, according to the Post, the Democrats failed to make “a remotely serious effort to discern who he is.” Instead, “Senator Schumer engaged in a demagogic effort to confront Mr. Estrada with anonymous allegations” about his alleged role in blackballing liberal law students who wanted to clerk for Justice Kennedy. The Post has figured out that the filibuster of Estrada’s nomination has nothing to do with Estrada’s allegedly inadequate answers to questions. The issue “is simply whether a conservative president can place on an appeals court a qualified conservative against whom no serious complaint has been made. The answer must be yes; for if he cannot, the courts will become the province of those anodyne centrists whose view don’t offend anyone in power.” Well said.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.