Assessing Noam Chomsky

The current issue of the New Criterion features a lead article on the political writing of Noam Chomsky. Chomsky must be one of the most demented men in American public life and his post-9/11 prominence is at the least troubling and at worst incomprehensible. I find his work revolting and therefore avoid anything but the most cursory familiarity with it. The article by Australian historian Keith Windschuttle performs a kind of service by reviewing Chomsky’s political writing, tracing its themes, and evaluating it: “The hypocrisy of Noam Chomsky.”

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses