The New York Times and Washington Post Sunday book sections each have reviews that are worthy of note. The Times Sunday Book Review carries Judge Richard Posner’s somewhat irritating review of an important, timely book by University of Minnesota Law School Professor Daniel Farber. Farber’s book is Lincoln’s Constitution and Posner’s review is “Desperate times, desperate measures.”
The Washington Post Book World has a review that, like the smell of burning incense, triggers personal memories for me of a different time and place. Those of us who lived through the late sixties and early seventies on college campuses could not escape seeing those far-out books of purported memoirs by Carlos Castaneda regarding his drug-induced adventures with the Mexican shaman Don Juan. Castaneda’s notoriety was such that in 1973 Time magazine published a cover story on Castaneda, right around the same time it was running articles on the dire threat of global cooling.
I read several of Castaneda’s books until it dawned on me that they were pure fakery. Amy Wallace, the daughter of Irving Wallace and brother of David Wallechinsky, not only fell for the books, she fell for Castaneda. She has written a memoir of her relationship with him entitled Sorcerer’s Apprentice that appears to have the virtue of being true, if pained. The review is “In thrall to Don Juan.”
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.