Michael Kinsley is even less impressed with Paul O’Neill than the Washington Post. After noting various instances of O’Neill’s vanity, Kinsley get to the heart of the matter: “O’Neill seems genuinely surprised to discover that Bush actually does intend to cut taxes (as he promised repeatedly in his campaign); that the administration wants “regime change” in Iraq (as did the previous administration and almost everyone else in the world — the question was what to do about it); that the president would, on balance, prefer to be reelected; and so on. Not a single weapon of mass destruction was wheeled into his office during his entire two-year tenure.” Kinsley concludes that “the only solid punch [O’Neill] lands on President Bush is unintentional: What kind of idiot would hire this idiot as secretary of the Treasury?”
-
Donate to PL
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish Review of Books
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media