Niall Ferguson, author of Colossus: The Price of America’s Empire, argues in the Washington Post that success in Iraq “requires patience.” And Ferguson means patience in the strong sense. For example, if Ferguson intended to shock his readers when he stated that our substantial military presence in Vietnam lasted “a mere seven years,” he succeeded with this reader. I was also taken aback when Ferguson cited President Bush’s statement that “we will remain in Iraq as long as necessary and not one day more,” as evidence of his “tight” timetable. Any argument that we should persevere in Iraq to the same extent that we did in Vietnam strikes me as based on an “empire for empire’s sake” sentiment, as opposed to an analysis of what is required to ensure the security of this country.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.