The Harvard faculty has narrowly voted (218-185) to express “no confidence” in the leadership of Harvard President Lawrence Summers. Socrates was convicted of impiety by a roughly comparable vote of 280-220. Click here for the Harvard Crimson report, and here for the AP report.
The vote essentially represents the conviction of President Summers for not believing in the gods of the city. Unlike the “Apology of Socrates,” however, the apology of Summers was a ritually repeated exercise in self-abasement.
The resolution condemning Summers was the handiwork of Harvard Professor of Anthropology and of African and African-American Studies J. Lorand Matory. Speaking like a true Athenian, Matory commented following the vote, “There is no noble alternative for him but resignation.”
Let us now recall the words of the great Willliam F. Buckley Jr.: “I would rather be governed by the first 200 names in the Boston phone book, than by the Harvard faculty.” The wisdom of Buckley’s statement is proving timeless.
HINDROCKET adds: Of the educational institutions with which I have been associated, the one for which I have the least affection is Harvard. This story reminds me why. Summers is liberal, but not, apparently, liberal enough. His ritual denunciation by the wacko fringe of the Harvard faculty–oops, sorry, that’s a majority–is sickening. But this degradation has been a long time coming.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.