Posted on February 6, 2006 by Paul Mirengoff

Democrats to Offer Contract with al Qaeda?

In 1994, the Republicans took control of both houses of Congress by offering a “Contract With America” that set out principles the Republicans would follow if they were elected. A.J. Strata thinks the Democrats have a similar strategy in mind for 2006, only this time, what the Democrats are proposing is not a Contract With America, but a Contract With al Qaeda.
It’s a hard-hitting post, and I’m sure that the Democrats in the Senate would claim that it doesn’t fairly represent their views. Read it, and judge for yourself. In the meantime, we’d like to hear from a Senate Democrat who is willing to explain why A.J.’s analysis is wrong.

Share
Tweet

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses

Posted on by John Hinderaker

Democrats to Offer Contract with al Qaeda?

In 1994, the Republicans took control of both houses of Congress by offering a “Contract With America” that set out principles the Republicans would follow if they were elected. A.J. Strata thinks the Democrats have a similar strategy in mind for 2006, only this time, what the Democrats are proposing is not a Contract With America, but a Contract With al Qaeda.
It’s a hard-hitting post, and I’m sure that the Democrats in the Senate would claim that it doesn’t fairly represent their views. Read it, and judge for yourself. In the meantime, we’d like to hear from a Senate Democrat who is willing to explain why A.J.’s analysis is wrong.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses