“Saves Lives? Do It.”

That’s the title of Debra Burlingame’s op-ed in this morning’s New York Post. Debra defends the NSA terrorist surveillance program, on which hearings are getting underway today in the Senate. She notes an NBC report that I didn’t know about:

Missing in the debate over the program to eavesdrop on suspected terrorists without a warrant is the question of whether or not it works.
A 2004 NBC report graphically illustrated what not having this program cost us 41/2 years ago. In 1999, the NSA began monitoring a known al Qaeda “switchboard” in Yemen that relayed calls from Osama bin Laden to operatives all over world. The surveillance picked up the phone number of a “Khalid” in the United States

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses

“Saves Lives? Do It.”

That’s the title of Debra Burlingame’s op-ed in this morning’s New York Post. Debra defends the NSA terrorist surveillance program, on which hearings are getting underway today in the Senate. She notes an NBC report that I didn’t know about:

Missing in the debate over the program to eavesdrop on suspected terrorists without a warrant is the question of whether or not it works.
A 2004 NBC report graphically illustrated what not having this program cost us 41/2 years ago. In 1999, the NSA began monitoring a known al Qaeda “switchboard” in Yemen that relayed calls from Osama bin Laden to operatives all over world. The surveillance picked up the phone number of a “Khalid” in the United States

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses