An interview with Ken Mehlman during election season is not to be missed, even when it’s conducted by the insufferable Charlie Rose. Last night, Rose tried to score against Mehlman with questions like (in essence) are you content to have this election be decided based on Bush taking us into and then mismanaging a war we’re losing in search of WMD that weren’t there. When Mehlman had no difficulty with these brush back pitches, Rose went to his “heater” — a clip of Barack Obama (no less) claiming nonsensically that Mehlman’s strategy has been to win elections by “50 percent plus one,” whereas the Democrats plan to build a broad and inclusive working majority.
When the clip was over, Rose turned to Mehlman like a proud papa and asked, “What did you think of THAT.” Mehlman noted that it had not been his intention to win with 51 percent of the vote, adding that, though it worked out that way in 2004, the party made huge inroads with Hispanic voters and decent inroads with African-Americans in large cities. Rose quickly changed the subject to the economy (if I recall correctly) which he thinks is doing badly.
Every conservative has his or her pet thing the Republican Congress has failed to do. Mine is ending all federal funding for the left-wing public broadcasting apparatus that Charlie Rose exemplifies.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.