The Washington Post’s Jim Hoagland shows that one need not admire President Bush to be concerned about the apparent return of the foreign policy “realists.” As Hoagland notes, these are the “policymakers who failed to anticipate and then opposed the breakup of the Soviet Union; who were not realistic enough to see, much less prevent, the Balkans from plunging into flames; and who coddled dictators from Beijing to Baghdad.”
Judging from recent reports, the Baker prescription for dealing with Iraq will consist of coddling dictators from Damascus to Teheran.
Hoagland sees “realism” as “too often a euphemism for cyniicism, for playing for time, and passing up big opportunities. . . .” In the current environment — with Iran poised to become a nuclear power — trying to buy time is not a very realistic option. Neither, says Hoagland, is trying to get back to the 1990s. Instead, “true realism lies in recognizing that [President Bush’s] diagnosis of a crumbling order in the Middle East was sound, even if his prescriptions were not.”
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
-
Most Read on Power Line
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Thinker
- Ann Althouse
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Dartblog
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Legal Insurrection
- Library of Law and Liberty
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Roger L. Simon
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
- Urgent Agenda
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
-
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell
-
Archives
-