Is the Investigation Over Now?

The Drudge Report has obtained documents that appear to show conclusively that Scott Beauchamp fabricated the stories that he wrote for the New Republic. These documents include a transcript of New Republic editor Frank Foer’s telephone interview of Beauchamp, in which Beauchamp declines to vouch for, or answer questions about, his own stories–which causes Foer to say that “we just can’t, in good conscience, continue to defend the piece.”
Drudge also has documents from the Army’s investigation, including Beauchamp’s signed confession that his articles included “gross exaggerations and inaccurate allegations of misconduct” by his fellow servicemen. The third document is the Army’s summary of the results of its investigation, which found that Beauchamp “completely fabricated” the story of the disfigured woman, and that his tales of finding a Saddam-era mass grave and of servicemen running down Iraqi dogs were false and “completely unfounded.”
Maybe the New Republic will finally have something to say about the story.
To comment on this post, go here.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses