Yesterday, I wrote about Alvin Greene, the Democratic nominee to run against Sen. Jim DeMint in South Carolina. Greene, a political novice, reportedly ran essentially no campaign — no events, no signs, no debates, no website, no fundraising. Nonetheless, he obtained almost 60 percent of the vote in his race against Vic Rawl, a county council member and former state legislator.
Now, Rep. Jim Clyburn is claiming, as the article I linked to yesterday suggested, that Greene might be a Republican plant. And he wants the U.S. Attorney to investigate. “Somebody gave [Greene] that $10,000 [the filing fee] and he who took it should be investigated, and he who gave it should be investigated,” Clyburn intoned.
If Republicans did “plant” Greene, the move would stand in contrast to the Democrats, who restrict voter choice by inducing candidates not to run for the Senate. But did Republicans “plant” the nearly 100,000 voters who chose Greene instead of the establishment Democrat?
UPDATE: Here’s an extended interview with Mr. Greene. He’s a man of few words and handles condescension well (see especially the last few questions). I don’t anticipate too much offensively negative campaigning either by Greene or Sen. DeMint.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
-
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell
Archives
-
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.