Climateers Caught in the Vortex

Frozen Gore copyComing on the heels of the Ship of Fools stunt in Antarctica last week, these are the worst of times for the climate campaign. And just where is Al Gore these past 10 days?  As is well known, wherever Gore goes, a cold snap seems to follow; there’s even a Wikipedia entry for the “Gore Effect.”  He should be cast as Mr. Freeze in the inevitable Batman remake.  I’ve been wondering if he’s on some kind of nationwide tour right now, which would explain the cold weather in the eastern half of the country.

Click to embiggen

Click to embiggen

The cold snap may well be consistent with the general theory of global warming climate change, as the spinners are frantically arguing this week.  (Andy Revkin points out–see the nearby chart–that while it’s colder than normal here, it is warmer than normal in Siberia. But let that sink in a moment.  Siberia.  The chart doesn’t tell us that it’s still really really cold there—this chart is a measure of relative temperatures, not actual temperatures.  Because it’s flippin’ Siberia.)  The trouble is that climate change has become what philosophers call a “non-falsifiable hypothesis.”  Everything—Hurricane Sandy, warm winters, cold winters—is said to be proof of climate change.

Try this parlor game out at a cocktail party next time you’re clinking ice-free glasses with a warmist: ask him to specify what climate or weather phenomenon would not be consistent with the general theory of climate change.  And then step back and enjoy the fun.  Being a climateer is almost as easy as being a Keynesian.

The trouble with this disposition is that it violates the Occam’s Razor that most people of common sense carry about in their hip pocket: if it’s really cold over a wide area, the warming theory loses the persuasive power that comes from hyping a crisis.  Plus the fact that once upon a time, the same group of folks told us that polar vortices like the one we are having right now was evidence of imminent global cooling.

Steven Goddard of the Real Science blog has the goods on Time magazine.  From the 1974 Time article “Another Ice Age?”:

Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.

And guess what Time is saying this week?  Yup:

But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles. Usually the fast winds in the vortex—which can top 100 mph (161 k/h)—keep that cold air locked up in the Arctic. But when the winds weaken, the vortex can begin to wobble like a drunk on his fourth martini, and the Arctic air can escape and spill southward, bringing Arctic weather with it. In this case, nearly the entire polar vortex has tumbled southward, leading to record-breaking cold.

In other words, the climateers have been caught in a vortex of their own making.  Good luck getting out of that self-generated swirl.

Oh what the heck: who can forget this oldie but goodie.

Oh what the heck: who can forget this oldie but goodie.

JOHN adds: If my amateur physics is correct, the principle of conservation of energy dictates that when it is unusually cold in one place, it is unusually warm somewhere else, and vice versa. Thus, it is not at all surprising if Siberia is relatively balmy for this time of year. The problem is that the climateers have ignored this principle for years, hyping every hot spell anywhere in the world, while ignoring the fact that for every hot spot, there is a cold spot. So now they are hoist by their own petard; let them spin.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.