The impeachment farce continues unabated behind closed doors for the time being under the leadership of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff. One is invited to ponder the imponderables. Why behind closed doors? Why the House Intelligence Committee? Is there a more vile figure in American public life than Adam Schiff? And — related question — who is leaking the “secret” testimony to which we are treated in the daily dribble?
The impeachment farce is of course supported by the Democrats’ public relations arm. The Washington Post, for example, pieced together the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, this past week’s hero of the proceedings. The Post talked to three people familiar Vindman’s testimony and reported that Vindman “was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt to subvert U.S. foreign policy…”
What’s wrong with this picture? (There may be more than one correct answer.) Brit Hume invites us to add this highly ponderable question to the list.
This from the article: “he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy…” There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is? https://t.co/L1Jfgck6G2
— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 2, 2019
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.