Can you apply social science analysis to judge whether certain progressive rock bands are any good? The Onion, which recently claimed in a filing to the U.S. Supreme Court that it is “the world’s leading news publication” with “a daily readership of 4.3 trillion and [is] the single most powerful and influential organization in human history,” thinks you can. As usual, the findings appear inconclusive, requiring further study.
Scientists Still Unable To Determine Whether Yes A Good Band
CAMBRIDGE, MA—Following a three-decade-long, multimillion-dollar study to evaluate the progressive rock group’s music, a team of scientists at Harvard University announced Wednesday that they were no closer to determining if the British band Yes is good or not. “While deep sonic analysis reveals technically interesting aspects to the band’s discography—1971’s The Yes Album and 1983’s 90125, in particular—we continue to struggle in our efforts to conclusively demonstrate whether Yes is actually a decent band,” said head researcher Dr. Jeremy Loach. . .”
Well, there’s this perhaps:
Chaser—I dub this chart to be true and accurate!
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.