Men In Women’s Sports: The Resistance

President Trump has issued an executive order that, in various ways, seeks to prevent men from competing on women’s sports teams. The state of California has announced that it will not abide by Trump’s executive order, and will continue to allow men in women’s sports. That has gotten quite a bit of publicity; what is less well known is that the Minnesota State High School League has said the same thing.

MSHSL says that the state’s human rights law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of “gender identity,” governs, and it requires “trans” women (i.e., men) to be allowed into women’s sports. Of course, that doesn’t follow from the anti-discrimination law at all. But what is the practical consequence of allowing junior high school and high school boys and men onto women’s sports teams?

My youngest daughter won two state championships in dance, which in Minnesota is a major team sport. In the course of that career she and her teammates had a run-in with the State High School League. She refers to that, as well as describing the consequences of the State High School League’s determination to allow men on girls’ dance teams, in this X thread:


I asked my daughter whether the girls are naked in dressing rooms. Her answer:

Oh yeah lol. Every day in a tiny room. You’re naked next to someone two inches away.

So Minnesota’s State High School League wants naked 18-year-old women (or 12-year-old girls, I’m not sure which is worse) dressing inches away from naked 18-year-old men. This is the idiocy to which anti-Trump ideology has led us.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses