In the post below, I argue that the quality of a Supreme Court nominee’s law school is irrelevant when it comes to assessing his or her qualifications. In my opinion, however, prior judicial experience is quite relevant. To some extent, this a just common sense. Prior experience doing the same work is universally considered important for almost every job that requires skill. I made a more nuanced argument on this matter here, in a piece for the Daily Standard.
It’s important to note, however, that while prior judicial experience is a valuable qualification, its absence doesn’t necessarily make a nominee unqualified.
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
Most Read on Power Line
- The Week in Pictures: Special Al Franken Edition
- On blue slips, Grassley pulls the trigger
- How Al Franken Sees Himself, and How Others See Him
- Kirsten Gillibrand's intellectual dishonesty [UPDATED]
- Gloria Allred won't allow inspection of yearbook
- It wasn't "the times" that caused feminists to give Bill Clinton a pass
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell