Fresh from having taken down the “Pakistan First” option mooted by Joe Biden for dealing (or rather not dealing) with Afghanistan, the Washington Post editorial board turns its attention to the approach recently mooted by President Obama himself – maintaining current troop levels and building up the Afghan army. The Post notes that this approach, while sparing Obama from the wrath of his political base, would perpetuate the losing approach employed by the Bush administration in recent years while mirroring the pre-surge approach that “brought Iraq to the brink of catastrophe.”
It will be quite something if Obama’s “Plan B” for Afghanistan turns out to be more of the Bush policy he regularly castigated. It’s fine to criticize that policy, but only if you’re prepared to change it. Thus, the Post shows intellectual honesty – it blames the Bush administration for leaving Obama with the current mess, while supporting what may well be a more effective approach to fighting a war it has consistently supported.
The same cannot be said for liberals like E.J. Dionne who accept the importance of succeeding in Afghanistan, excoriate Bush for leaving a mess, but balk when it comes to adopting a more aggressive approach. As the Post notes, to the extent that Bush left a mess, he did so because he kept “sending just enough reinforcement s each year to match the growing threat of the Taliban but never enough to turn the situation around.” Those who are unwilling now to raise troop levels exponentially should have the decency to stop carping about Bush’s refusal to do so.
E.J. Dionne’s position amounts to this: (1) only Republicans have the stomach for fighting wars to win; (2) it was therefore up to them to win in Afghanistan; (3) instead they focused on Iraq and left Afghanistan in poor shape, (4) don’t ask us to take political risks in Afghanistan to further America’s security interests, that’s the Republicans’ job.
That’s a deplorable posture for anyone to assume; it would be a criminal one for our president to adopt.
Most Read on Power Line
- Why You Should Be Sympathetic Toward Cliven Bundy
- Today's IRS Documents: What Do They Show?
- Standoff at Bundy Ranch Ends, With Photo of the Year So Far
- The War On Standards Comes to College Debate [with comment by Paul]
- Is Scott Walker on his way to 2016 front-runner status?
- At Dartmouth, Phil Hanlon wants no enemies to the left
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell