Steve Sailer provides his usual offbeat analysis of a hot issue — Dr. Bennett’s gambling: “Bennett’s gambling in perspective.” I think Sailer’s conclusion is on the money, so to speak, with the exception of its description of Michael Kinsley as ascetic — effeminate would be more like it: “This old college football lineman’s critics, such as the ascetic, almost bird-like journalist Michael Kinsley, may not understand why so many people like him. Americans have seldom wanted to be lectured on virtue by people who look like they don’t understand the appeal of vice. Bennett, who drinks, used to smoke, and eats and eats, is clearly a man of appetites. Eventually, he’ll be poised to come back as the traditionally appealing figure, the reformed sinner.”
-
Donate to PL
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish Review of Books
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media