Stanley Kurtz follows the advice of Johnny Mercer and Hillary Clinton, and accentuates the positive he perceives in the Supreme Court’s University of Michigan preferential admissions decisions, in this piece for National Review Online. He argues that Justice O’Connor’s romance with “Mr. In-between” has created enough of a mess to provide hope to those who oppose blatant racial discrimination against white college applicants. Accordingly, Kurtz concludes by urging readers to contribute to the Center for Individual Rights so that it can carry on the fight.
Kurtz’s analysis is based on the proposition that “colleges and universities are incapable of running their preference programs in conformity with Grutter v. Bollinger. The achievement gaps that have to be overcome are so large that race simply has to be turned into a decisive factor
-
Donate to PL
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish Review of Books
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media