What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make?

Democrats are convinced that Hillary Clinton is a powerhouse presidential candidate, notwithstanding the fact that the only elections she has ever actually won were for the Senate; she ran in New York, a state in which she did not live, while she was First Lady. Which is, essentially, cheating. She was then reelected. After that, she lost the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination despite being universally considered the inevitable nominee. Is that the track record of an outstanding political talent? I don’t think so, and in recent months we have been reminded of how often Ms. Hillary puts her foot in it.

Michael Ramirez isn’t much impressed by Hillary, either. Click to enlarge:

RAMclr102914-hillary-IBD-COLOR-FINAL-147.gif.cms

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses