Okay, so when the Obama Administration says it is seeking a “proportionate” response to the North Korean hack of Sony, we know that is a euphemism for “weak response.” Wouldn’t want to upset our new friends, the Castros down on Cuba, who we know are tight with the Kims. Exchange holiday cards and torture tips and all that. What was the first clue? When Obama referred to James Franco as “James Flacco.” Most observers thought he was confusing Franco with the Baltimore Ravens QB, but I think Obama had “flaccid” on his mind, since it describes his response. Meanwhile, best not take our eyes off the most significant threat to the nation’s future—the Clintons.
Just because. F— yeah.
What next year’s Academy Awards telecast will now look like.
Speaking of cigars. . .
Dare we even suggest a caption contest for this. . .
No wonder Hillary talks about “empathy” a lot. Oh, wait. . .
Wait, what?
My kind of Christmas tree.
The perfect stocking stuffer for a liberal.
And finally. . .
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.