New York Post columnist and laptop from hell historian Miranda Devine explains “How CIA interference with the ‘Dirty 51′ letter made Biden president.” She writes in her column this morning (links omitted):
Several of the people who signed the “Spies Who Lie” letter about Hunter Biden’s laptop were active CIA contractors, according to records.
It is chilling to contemplate that, if it had not been for the malign intervention of the CIA in the 2020 election, Donald Trump would have won a second term and the wars currently raging in Ukraine and Gaza would never have happened.
We now see that the CIA staged a domestic disinformation campaign to protect its favored candidate, the decrepit and pliable Joe Biden, from the political consequences of his corruption.
Now we are told that former CIA Director Gina Haspel was in on the “Dirty 51” letter in October 2020 that falsely claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
This bombshell, revealed by the CIA former Chief Operating Officer Andrew Makridis to congressional investigators, will go down in history as an act of sabotage against the American people by a rogue intelligence agency.
What it tells us is that the CIA itself, not just 51 retired intelligence officials, colluded with the Biden campaign on the eve of the 2020 election to discredit the New York Post’s reporting of Biden’s involvement in his family’s international influence-peddling scheme, as documented on his crackhead son’s abandoned computer.
Makridis has testified to the House Judiciary Committee that he was sent a draft version of the letter by the CIA’s Publication Classification Review Board on Oct. 19, 2020, and recognized it as an inherently political document.
Because of its political sensitivity, he walked across the hall from his office to inform Director Haspel about the letter….
Whole thing here. Devine’s column follows up on the information that I took up in this post yesterday.
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.